20 May 2020: ‘bring your own booze’ get together
A leaked e mail from the prime minister’s principal non-public secretary confirmed No 10 employees had been invited to “bring your own booze” to an occasion within the Downing Street backyard.
18 June 2020: Cabinet Office leaving do
A gathering befell within the 70 Whitehall constructing to mark the departure of a non-public secretary, Hannah Young.
19 June 2020: Boris Johnson’s 56th birthday
Downing Street has mentioned employees “gathered briefly” within the Cabinet Room. Johnson, his spouse and the chancellor, Rishi Sunak, all obtained fines, it has been confirmed.
13 November 2020: Downing Street flat do
Carrie Johnson reportedly hosted events within the official flat over No 11 the place she and the prime minister, together with one occasion on 13 November, the night time of Dominic Cummings’s acrimonious departure.
13 November 2020: leaving get together for senior aide
Johnson was reported to have given a leaving speech for Lee Cain, his departing director of communications and an in depth ally of Cummings.
17 December 2020: Cabinet Office ‘Christmas party’
The cupboard secretary, Simon Case, eliminated himself from the inquiry into events – to get replaced by Sue Gray – after reviews emerged of a gathering within the Cabinet Office.
17 December 2020: leaving drinks for former Covid taskforce head
Leaving drinks had been held within the Cabinet Office for the previous director common of the federal government’s Covid taskforce Kate Josephs.
17 December 2020: No 10 leaving do
A leaving do for a departing Downing Street official befell at No 10.
18 December 2020: Downing Street Christmas get together
Officials and advisers reportedly made speeches, loved a cheese board, drank collectively and exchanged Secret Santa items, though the prime minister will not be thought to have attended.
14 January 2021: extra Downing Street leaving drinks
A gathering in No 10 on the departure of two non-public secretaries.
16 April 2021: leaving drinks for the outgoing communications director James Slack One of two leaving dos held on the night time earlier than the Queen sat alone at Prince Philip’s funeral.
16 April 2021: leaving do for an additional departing Downing Street official
This is one other occasion, separate to Slack’s leaving do, that befell at a Whitehall location.
Lord Macdonald, a former director of public prosecutions, spoke to the BBC this morning in regards to the prime minister’s single high-quality.
He mentioned it was not recognized why Johnson was fined for being at one get together, however not others, or why cupboard secretary Simon Case was not fined.
Asked about junior employees being fined for incidents which the PM was not fined for, he advised the Today programme that and not using a police rationalization “it’s very difficult for us to understand why they came to the conclusions that they did”.
The crossbench peer added that the dearth of transparency about such a “major scandal” was “not good enough”.
We don’t know who these persons are, and I do really feel for the junior civil servants and I fairly see why they might be distressed by their names being given, however there’s a wider public curiosity right here.
This was a serious scandal on the coronary heart of presidency, on the coronary heart of the civil service, and we stay very a lot in the dead of night about who was concerned, who organised the events, and who was accountable.
Of course the prime minister and the top of the civil service are in the end accountable, however there plainly had been different folks as properly who had been concerned on this and we merely don’t know who they’re, and I believe that’s not adequate.
As we first reported final night time, civil servants and particular advisers have reacted with fury and disbelief after Scotland Yard confirmed Johnson acquired solely considered one of 126 fines levied for law-breaking events on the coronary heart of Downing Street and Whitehall.
The Metropolitan police has come beneath intense stress to elucidate the way it reached its conclusions after Downing Street mentioned officers confirmed no additional motion could be taken towards the prime minister regardless of him attending gatherings for which others had been fined.
A former Met chief mentioned the pressure was open to claims it had bungled the investigation until it took steps to elucidate itself.
Brian Paddick, now a Liberal Democrat peer, mentioned: “The Met has no defence to the accusation that it gave the prime minister one fixed-penalty notice (FPN) as that was the minimum he could be fined, but did not do so for other events for political reasons,” he mentioned.
“The decision not to explain is a mistake. It was a mistake not to investigate in the first place. They said there was no need to investigate and then they issued 126 fines, which is not good for their credibility.”
Officials who had been amongst these fined had been struggling to grasp how Johnson might have escaped additional censure. He, his spouse, Carrie, and the chancellor, Rishi Sunak, obtained one high-quality every for celebrating the prime minister’s birthday in June 2020 when indoor gatherings, aside from work functions, had been banned.
Good morning and welcome to our reside UK political protection, which sees Partygate and the following Met investigation nonetheless dominating headlines.
Yesterday, the pressure introduced its four-month £460,000 investigation had concluded, with 126 fines issued in complete. Just a kind of was for the PM.
This has led to fury and disbelief amongst civil servants and particular advisers.
One Whitehall supply identified that junior civil servants had obtained FPNs for going to not less than one occasion which the prime minister not solely attended but in addition gave a speech at. Another mentioned: “It’s the twentysomethings I feel sorry for – who went to events that were their seniors’ leaving bashes and things.”
The conclusion of the investigation does, nevertheless, pave the best way for the publication of the Sue Gray report.
Her preliminary report discovered “failures of leadership and judgment by different parts of No 10 and the Cabinet Office”.
Now, the justice secretary has mentioned there must be “transparency” within the report about any ministers who’ve been fined.
Asked if Downing Street was making an attempt to forestall the senior civil servant from publishing particular person names in her report into social occasions at Downing Street throughout pandemic lockdown restrictions, Raab advised BBC Breakfast that that was a matter for the police and Sue Gray.
I believe that these are issues, who’s recognized, for Sue Gray and the Met.
What we now have mentioned is that it’s proper that if there’s a minister who has been fined, in fact there must be transparency round that. I believe that’s proper.
Asked when the report could be revealed, Raab didn’t specify a time however advised Times Radio it could come “as soon as possible”.
Obviously we’ve already had the interim report, and the prime minister has acted on it – the overhaul at quantity 10.
We will, on the minute we get the ultimate report, publish it as quickly as doable.
And the prime minister mentioned he’ll come to the House of Commons and take questions in order that we get have that further tier of transparency and accountability.
The House of Commons will not be sitting right this moment, however we’ll carry you all the newest developments from Westminster and past all through the day.