Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe has stated a UK Foreign Office official witnessed her signing a letter of false confession to the Iranian authorities as a part of the last-minute phrases of her launch in March.
She stated she anticipated Tehran to make use of the “confession”towards her sooner or later.
While “under duress”, the 44-year-old charity employee claimed she was compelled to confess to spying allegations made by Iran after they detained her for six years – a cost she and the UK denied.
Zaghari-Ratcliffe stated she was taken to the airport by the Iranian Revolutionary Guards with out seeing her mother and father on the day in March when she was to be freed.
“Instead I was made to sign the forced confession at the airport in the presence of the British government,” Zaghari-Ratcliffe advised the BBC.
The Iranians advised her the UK had settled a historic £400m debt relationship to the Seventies.
“They told me that ‘you won’t be able to get on the plane’. And I knew that that was like a last-minute game because I knew they were … they told me that they have been given the money,” she stated.
“So what is the point of making me sign a piece of paper which is incorrect? It’s a false confession.”
She stated a British official was current on the time she signed the doc.
“The whole thing of me signing the forced confession was filmed,” Zaghari-Ratcliffe added. “It’s a tool. So I’m sure they will show that some day.”
Tulip Siddiq, the MP for Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe’ constituency, stated the UK authorities had critical inquiries to reply, a reference to the presence of a British official on the time of the confession.
Earlier this month, her husband, Richard Ratcliffe, alluded to “mistakes made at the end” of her ordeal in Iran.
Speaking after his spouse’s first assembly with Boris Johnson since her launch, Mr Ratcliffe stated: “I think there are lessons to learn, there is a wider problem.
“We talked about the mistakes made at the end. It was rough at the end, and I think, when Nazanin is ready to talk about it, that is something that we need to go through.”
The Foreign Office described the act, which was captured on digicam, as “dehumanising” however the position of UK officers can be questioned by the household.